Really? I have to answer this question again? I've pretty much stated my reasons throughout this thread about a dozen times (hence why this thread is even posted in the first place). You'll just have to go back and reread.
Printable View
God bless CeeBee's users for they must need the patience of a saint.
In Apple terms this would be called a feature :D
http://www.networksteve.com/forum/to...=15854&Posts=2
Quote:
Hi Thanks for posting here. In widows server 2008 and 2008 R2 DNS management console , it sorts data alphabetically instead of numerically , and this is a by design behavior. Here also an old thread which discuss same situation for you refer: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/...c-f9470a2dfa6d
Quote:
The RTM version of 2008 is also sorting it in decending order, the only catch here is that it is giving preference the ASCII values.
192.168.1.23 ASCII Values (2 - 50, 3 - 51)
192.168.1.220 ASCII Values (2 - 50, 2 - 50, 0 - 48)
192.168.1.20 ASCII Values (2 - 50, 0 - 48)
192.168.1.123 ASCII Values (1 - 49, 2 - 50, 3 - 51)
192.168.1.10 ASCII Values (1 - 49, 0 - 48)